The trial of former Accountant General of the Federation (AGF), Ahmed Idris on alleged N109 billion corruption charges was on Wednesday stalled at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) due to the disappearance of one of the statements he made to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).


The statement dated July 5, 2022, could not be located by EFCC in its own file, in that of the high court as well as that of the defence team.


At yesterday’s proceedings, the anti-graft agency through its counsel, Mr. Oluwaleke Atolagbe, had kick-started trial-within-trial, following the denial by the ex- Accountant General that some of the statements he made to EFCC in respect of the suit were made voluntary.


Idris, who was re-arraigned last October, had persistently alleged that the key statements proposed by the EFCC to be used against him in the alleged corruption charges were made under duress.


Following the allegation, Justice Halilu Yusuf had ordered a trial-within-trial to authenticate the claim.


Although, the EFCC had presented his witness, Mr. Hayatudeen Suleiman, to tender 13 different statements, trouble however arose when it was discovered that a statement dated July 5, 2022, and said to be vital to the trial could not be found in the bundles of documents uploaded at the court by EFCC.


The trouble became worst when EFCC seeking to examine the witness could not find the statement in his own case file.


Responding, Idris’ lawyer, Chief Chris Uche, told the court that the statement was not part of those supplied to him by EFCC, adding that the anti-graft agency had suppressed some documents and that the missing statement of the defendant may be one of the suppressed documents.

Axact

STATE PRESS

StatePress is an online newspaper with wide and extensive coverage of socio political events in the Nigerian States, African Continent and beyond.  We break the news, focus on issues without bias and maintain highest level of professionalism in discharging our social responsibility.

Post A Comment: