TRENDING NOW

The National President of Progressive Organisation for Peace and Transformational Compliance (PROPATRAC), Princess Carol Ngozi has commended the Minister of FCT, Nyesom Wike for remaining focused in delivering modern infrastructure to residents of the nation's capital despite tough choices that have come with criticisms. 

She describes Wike as the best FCT Minister in recent history of Abuja who has not only brought a new outlook to the infrastructure base in the city centre but has made massive investment in ensuring that satellite towns get a new lease of life both in social amenities and security. 

Princess Carol Ngozi, the MD Kingdavid Project Limited said this on Tuesday in an interaction with journalists where she thanked President Tinubu for the choice of Wike as the FCT Minister. 

As former board member of state and federal government agencies, she said Wike has remained undeterred in lending support to the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Tinubu especially in ensuring that the second anniversary of the government in May is marked with life-changing structures that cut across roads, bridges, water projects, street lighting, and more. 

She said, "One must understand the very difficult choices before the Minister in ensuring that Abuja becomes a modern city that will favourably compete with other capital cities across Africa. 

"Changing the status quo and doing things differently has come with a temporary discomfort with FCT residents, but I think the bigger picture should be on the aftermath gains that come with such temporary discomfort. 

"There is hardly any part of Abuja where one project or the other is not going on. The popular phrase in the lips of everyone is" Wike is working" and indeed he truly does", Princess Carol who also oversees company's operations in the area of project Development, Marketing, Financing, Asset Management and investor Relation and more said. 

She urged the residents of Abuja to reciprocate to the kind gesture by protecting the infrastructure from theft and damage.

She further applauded His excellency, Ezenwo Nyesom Wike CON and prayed God bless and protect him.
Nigeria’s journey to FIFA World Cup 2026 has been far from smooth. With their hopes of automatic qualification hanging in the balance, every game matters more than ever – and the Super Eagles' next challenge is a must-win clash against Zimbabwe in Uyo on Tuesday.

But here’s the good news for bettors: Bet9ja is giving you the chance to back Nigeria risk-free, thanks to our Naija Money Back Special.

Place a bet on Nigeria to win, and if they fail to win the game, we’ll give you 100% of your stake back as a sports bonus. Win or lose, you don’t lose.

*How does it work?*
Bet at least ₦200 on Nigeria to beat Zimbabwe in their World Cup qualifier on Tuesday 25 March at 5pm.
This can be a single or multiple bet.
If Nigeria lose, you’ll receive 100% of your stake back as a sports bonus, up to ₦50,000.
Bonus will be credited by 4pm on 26 March and will be valid for 3 days.

This promo is valid for bets placed between 3pm on 21 March and 5pm on 25 March.

Nigeria might be under pressure, but history is firmly on their side.

The Super Eagles have faced Zimbabwe eight times and have only ever lost once – all the way back in 1981. We’ve been beaten by the Warriors on home soil, racking up an 8-1 aggregate score across three matches.

It’s a fixture that has traditionally gone Nigeria’s way, and with the likes of Victor Osimhen and Ademola Lookman expected to start, there’s every reason to believe the Super Eagles can deliver a much-needed win.

And even if they don’t? We’ve got your back.

It’s time to believe
Whether you’re feeling confident or cautious, this is your chance to support Nigeria without the fear of losing your stake.

We believe Super Eagles will soar to the occasion – and this is the perfect time to back the boys and join the journey.

This promo is valid for bets placed between 9am on 21/3/2025 – 5pm on 25/3/2025.

Back Nigeria risk-free – with the Naija Money Back Special – only on Bet9ja.
In clear demonstration of love, the founder of Promiseland Foundation, Amb. Mrs. Gift Emmanuel has taken to the street to reach out to members of the society by distributing food and other relief materials.

The programme titled, "Food Camp" is one of the series of similar outreaches she has embarked upon in recent times. The latest took place in FCT and attracted massive participation.

Persons from various religious and ethnic groups benefitted from the monthly outreach. A beneficiary who was identified as Talatu from Gombe state, a widow who could not withhold her tears of joy showered praises on the Foundation and its Co-founder, Amb. Gift Emmanuel, praying God to provide for the family for using it to bring smile to her lips.
A viral video showed where the hundreds of beneficiaries, mostly women surrounded and prayed for her. They also cheered and clapped for the Foundation, the founder and her husband, Dr. Lawrence Oloche Emmanuel who is the CEO of Promiseland Estates. 

Addressing the visibly happy beneficiaries, Mrs. Gift Emmanuel told them that the outreach which was sponsored by the foundation is borne out of her love for humanity and not that he has a lot of resources. 

She also used the opportunity to appeal to them to inform those who have not benefitted to come in subsequent editions while those who have benefitted will wait. 

Adequate arrangements were made for orderly conduct of the beneficiaries, making the outreach free of chaos despite the heavy crowd. 

Transportation was also provided to enable them return to their various destinations. 

Items distributed include rice, beans, corn, garri, potatoes and more.

Video:



Photos:

Suspended Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, has pushed back against claims made by President Bola Tinubu in his nationwide address on Tuesday night, countering accusations related to the state’s recent turmoil.

In his speech, Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers, suspending Fubara and members of the state’s House of Assembly for six months. He also appointed retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as the state’s sole administrator.

Reacting in a statement issued by his Chief Press Secretary, Nelson Chukwudi, Fubara refuted several allegations, particularly regarding the condition of the Rivers State House of Assembly complex.

He asserted that the facility, which was demolished, was already nearing 80% completion and not abandoned as suggested.

The statement reads in full: “Our attention has been drawn to a number of allegations claiming that Governor of Rivers State, His Excellency, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, did nothing to dissuade criminal groups and militants from making good their threats to attack oil installations in the State.

There was also another claim that after demolishing the Hallowed Chambers of the State House of Assembly on Moscow Road in Port Harcourt, the Governor did nothing to rebuild the facility.

Ordinarily, we would have ignored the statements as mere results of lack of adequate information to the Presidency by those tasked with the responsibility of providing same to guide decision-making, but it has become imperative to set the records straight and correct the erroneous impression such narratives are creating in the minds of the Nigerian people.

First, it is important to clarify that Governor Fubara has nothing to do with the threats by militants and also did not in any way “telegraph” the reported attacks on any oil facility in the State.

It is on record that the reaction of stakeholders in the Niger Delta, especially elders, chiefs, women, Ijaw National Congress, its youth wing, IYC, as well as militants, among others, was triggered by remarks by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Chief Nyesom Wike, in a live media chat, during which he dismissed Ijaws as a minority of the minorities and powerless in the Nigerian polity, saying that Ijaws are not the only ones that are militants and can blow up pipelines; that Ogonis, Ikwerres, and others are also militants and can as well blow up pipelines.

Most of the Ijaw groups and leaders even demanded an apology from the FCT Minister, which he rebuffed.

Available public records show that Governor Fubara, on several occasions and at every forum, including all the project commissioning events as well as the handover of the AW139 Helicopter to the Nigerian Air Force, between March 3 and 13, 2025, made it clear that his administration was committed to the peace, security, and safety of oil facilities in the State.

He often recalled his pivotal role as a member of the Presidential Committee on the Protection of Oil Installations in the Region, and repeatedly emphasized the need to protect oil pipelines and other facilities in the State, urging his supporters and the people of the State to avoid acts capable of destabilizing the State or sabotaging the nation’s economy.

Since inception as the Chief Executive of Rivers State, Governor Fubara has prioritized investment in upscaling the welfare and operational equipment of all personnel and arms of the Armed Forces and security agencies in the State by building livable office and residential accommodation for officers and men and donating vehicles, gunboats, helicopters, and other critical needs of the formations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in the performance of their duties.

His commitment to total peace and good governance in the State has contributed significantly to increased oil production and revenues for the country since May 29, 2023, as the continuous rise in the accruable revenue from the State into the Federation Account has shown over the months.

On the claim that the Governor acted with impunity to demolish the Hallowed Chambers of the State House of Assembly and did nothing to rebuild the Chambers 14 months after, it is on record that Governor Fubara acted based on professional advice and guidance.

Let it be clarified that the former Governor and now FCT Minister repeatedly criticized the dilapidated and leaking Assembly Complex, and during the commissioning of the Assembly Quarters in August 2022, challenged the lawmakers to take responsibility for the poor state of the edifice, rejecting requests to rebuild it to ensure a conducive legislative environment for the lawmakers.

It must be noted that immediately after the incident of October 29, 2023, and experts’ reports, the Government decided to heed the age-old demands of the lawmakers to rebuild the facility and promptly demolished the dilapidated structure to give way to a state-of-the-art Assembly Complex, which is now nearly 80 percent completed.

It would be recalled that in the wake of the most peaceful and violence-free Local Government election in the State on the 5th October, 2024, the supporters of the FCT Minister violently attacked and razed facilities in some local government council secretariats without any reprisals from Governor Fubara’s supporters.

It is also pertinent to draw the attention of security agencies to the fact that LGAs where those attacks were unleashed are the same places that have repeatedly witnessed violence perpetrated by detractors of the Governor Fubara-led administration.

This is why it is important for the security agencies to focus on the real purveyors of violence, critically evaluate these incidents, and diligently undertake investigations to unravel the elements behind the crimes and bring them to justice without let or hindrance.

It is clearly untrue that somebody who has all the while preached peace and non-violence, even in the face of extreme provocations, would be “telegraphing attacks on oil pipelines” and breaching the peace he has worked so hard to promote and sustain for the good of the people of the State. ”

A comprehensive salary verification exercise to ensure transparency and accountability in salary payments has commenced in Kano State.

The Secretary to the State Government, Umar Ibrahim, led an inspection team to various salary validation centers to assess staff records and address payroll discrepancies.

According to Ibrahim, the initiative is part of the government’s efforts to promote financial discipline and improve efficiency in civil service salary administration.

“This exercise aligns with our commitment to eliminating irregularities and ensuring that only rightful employees receive salaries,” he stated.

During the visit to the Pilgrims Welfare Board, Ibrahim assured civil servants that salaries would be paid on time before Sallah, provided they completed the verification process. He also emphasized that past salary-related challenges had been effectively resolved.

The verification exercise will continue across multiple centers to ensure compliance with payroll integrity standards.

Head of Civil Service, Abdullahi Musa, reiterated the importance of proper salary management in fostering good governance and maintaining an accurate record of civil servants.

The Federal Government has not yet commenced direct allocation of funds to Local Government Areas (LGAs) due to ongoing procedural steps, says Hon. Odunayo Alegbere, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Association of Local Governments of Nigeria (ALGON).

Alegbere revealed that LGAs have been instructed to open accounts with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to facilitate the process. While the implementation is still in progress, he praised the Federal Government’s commitment to local government financial autonomy, following a Supreme Court ruling on the matter.

He emphasized that direct allocation would empower local governments financially, allowing them to execute projects independently and tackle poverty at the grassroots level.

Although full financial autonomy has not been achieved, Alegbere noted that significant strides are being made. He criticized the current system where state governments oversee local government elections, arguing that it often leads to appointments rather than democratic selections. However, he expressed confidence that ongoing constitutional amendments by the National Assembly would address this issue.

“We are happy with the president, and though we have not yet reached our goal, we are making steady progress,” he said.

Alegbere highlighted the urgent need to address poverty at the grassroots, stating that direct allocation would play a crucial role in eradicating extreme deprivation.

“If you look at the grassroots level, the level of abject poverty is alarming. But with this new arrangement, we are confident that we will eradicate and stamp out poverty,” he said.

He also advocated for removing the State Independent Electoral Commission (SIEC) from the constitution, proposing that a national body oversee local government elections to ensure fairness.

Linking Nigeria’s security challenges to weaknesses in the local government system, Alegbere called for the restoration of full autonomy and the inclusion of traditional institutions in governance to improve security efforts.

“Unless and until we revisit the older system, addressing insecurity will remain a challenge,” he stressed.

He urged the Federal Government to integrate traditional rulers into the local government structure to enhance grassroots security.

Commenting on the political crisis in Rivers State, Alegbere commended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for his intervention, stating that the declaration of a state of emergency prevented a potential civil war.

Regarding disputes over ALGON’s leadership, he dismissed claims by a factional group regarding the Secretary-General position, asserting that the organization has a clear leadership structure.

He expressed confidence in the Federal Government’s continued implementation of the Supreme Court’s ruling, reinforcing local government administration.

“We are the umbrella body of the 774 local governments in Nigeria, and we will continue to support the president in ensuring that the local government system functions effectively,” he concluded.

A total of 29 individuals involved in internet fraud have been convicted and sentenced to various prison terms by Justices A.N. Erhabor and W.I. Aziegbemhin of the Edo State High Courts.

The verdicts were delivered in Benin City after the convicts were prosecuted by the Benin Zonal Directorate of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Among those sentenced were Edeyibo Hope, Igbafe David, Emakhu Bonfrey, Genesis Ndujifor, Okolosie Godstime, Chukwu David, Ebuka Emmanuel, Akhe Akahomhen, Odiniru Vet, Obiora Kelvin, and Stephen Eghosa, among others.

The convicted internet fraudster commonly known ass Yahoo boys faced a one-count charge related to offences such as obtaining by false pretence, advance fee fraud, retention of proceeds of crime, and possession of fraudulent documents. All pleaded guilty.

Justice Erhabor sentenced some of the convicts to two years in prison, with the option of a ₦200,000 fine. Justice Aziegbemhin issued similar sentences, while some individuals were ordered to pay ₦400,000 in fines.

Additionally, the court ruled that a red Mercedes-Benz C300, registered as BEN258CM, along with mobile phones, computers, and cash linked to the fraudulent activities, be forfeited.

The convictions followed an EFCC sting operation based on credible intelligence regarding cybercrime activities.

The trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), is set to restart today before a new judge at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Kanu, who was extradited from Kenya in 2021, has been facing treason-related charges. However, after three years of proceedings, he expressed a lack of confidence in Justice Binta Nyako, who had been handling the case.

Following this development, the case was reassigned to Justice James Omotosho, who scheduled March 21 for fresh proceedings. Hearing notices have reportedly been sent to all parties, and the case file, along with necessary documents, has been transferred to the new court.

Barring any last-minute delays, Kanu is expected to be re-arraigned today on the remaining seven charges brought against him by the Federal Government.

In a December 15, 2023 ruling, the Supreme Court ordered Kanu to stand trial on the remaining charges, overturning the earlier decision of the Court of Appeal that had discharged and acquitted him. The apex court acknowledged that Kanu’s extradition from Kenya was illegal but ruled that this did not strip the Federal High Court of its jurisdiction to proceed with the trial.

Since the Supreme Court’s verdict, little progress had been made as Kanu’s legal team repeatedly requested more time and resources to prepare his defence.

On September 24, 2023, Justice Nyako stepped down from the case after Kanu openly demanded her withdrawal. Although the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho, initially rejected her withdrawal and ordered her to continue, he later reassigned the case to Justice Omotosho, setting the stage for today’s proceedings.

The Federal Government has approved the mobilisation of all full-time Higher National Diploma (HND) graduates for the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), ending years of exclusion from the scheme.

Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, announced the decision on Thursday in Abuja, stating that only graduates of full-time HND programs would be eligible for mobilisation. The policy shift follows consultations with the Director-General of the NYSC and is aimed at promoting fairness in the education sector.

“The Federal Ministry of Education remains committed to equity, fairness, and inclusivity in Nigeria’s education system,” Alausa said in a statement released by the ministry’s Director of Press and Public Relations, Folasade Boriowo.

To ensure smooth implementation, the National Board for Technical Education (NBTE) has been directed to compile data on eligible HND graduates. A circular has also been issued to polytechnic rectors, instructing them to upload the necessary graduate records to a newly established HND admission portal, which will serve as the official database for NYSC mobilisation.

However, the minister clarified that part-time HND graduates remain ineligible for the scheme.

“This decision applies strictly to those who completed a full-time HND programme,” Alausa reiterated.

He urged all qualified graduates to take advantage of the opportunity and begin their mobilisation process immediately.

The move is expected to address long-standing concerns among polytechnic graduates and enhance their participation in national development through the NYSC scheme.

The Edo State Government has announced the termination of 10 road contracts as part of efforts to streamline project execution and ensure quality standards.

Commissioner for Information and Communications, Paul Ohonbamu, made the disclosure after a State Executive Council meeting at the Government House in Benin City.

According to Ohonbamu, the decision was taken to maintain uniform standards, prevent project overlaps, and rescope the contracts for quicker completion. He added that the government would assess the level of work done to determine appropriate compensation for contractors.

“This is to defray what they have done and any other payment accruable. The government is not terminating them with punishment. But the quantum of work will be analysed, and what they deserve will be paid.

“This no doubt shows that the governor does not have any oppressive tendency but follows the rules to agree to pay those who are performing,” he said.

Ohonbamu also noted that the state would settle outstanding payments for 10 contractors engaged by the previous administration, ensuring that ongoing projects are not delayed.

Additionally, the state government approved new contracts for road reconstruction in Ovia North East, Esan North East, and Oredo Local Government Areas.

“The State Executive Council also approved the renovation of some dilapidated public schools across the state in line with the government’s commitment to improving the learning environment,” he stated.

He emphasized that Governor Monday Okpebholo’s administration inherited deteriorating school infrastructure and is taking decisive steps to create better conditions for students.

“In four months, the governor has been able to put in place a solid foundation to build upon sustainable infrastructure and human capital development of the people of Edo State,” Ohonbamu added.

The Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development, Abdullahi Ata, has dismissed the recent political coalition involving former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, and Labour Party’s Peter Obi, stating that their alliance poses no real challenge to President Bola Tinubu ahead of the 2027 elections.

Speaking through his media aide, Seyi Olorunsola, the minister described the coalition as “dead on arrival.”

Ata commended President Tinubu’s leadership, emphasizing that his administration is steering Nigeria toward economic and political stability through key reforms. He argued that these policies are already yielding positive results, strengthening public confidence in the government.

He urged Atiku, Obi, and El-Rufai—whom he described as “three elusive political wanderers”—to acknowledge that Nigerians have embraced Tinubu’s leadership. He insisted that the country has moved past experimental governance and would not rally behind politicians who, in his view, lack a clear ideological direction.

Highlighting Tinubu’s governance style, Ata praised his commitment to the rule of law, democratic values, and transparency in handling national affairs. He pointed to the President’s role in resolving the recent political crisis in Rivers State as an example of his leadership.

The minister further criticized the opposition figures, dismissing Atiku as a “serial contender” repeatedly rejected at the polls, while describing El-Rufai as a “desperate power seeker” whose past political actions have eroded his credibility. On Obi, he accused him of stoking ethnic and religious divisions and argued that such tactics would not help him secure the presidency.

Ata concluded by reaffirming that Tinubu remains a transformative and transparent leader committed to national development. He maintained that the administration is focused on delivering progress and would not be sidetracked by political alliances lacking substance.

The Federal Capital Territory Emergency Management Department (FEMD) has confirmed another accident on Thursday under Karu Bridge along the Abuja-Keffi Expressway.

In a statement issued in Abuja, the department’s Acting Director-General, Mr. Abdulrahman Mohammed, assured that no lives were lost in the incident.

According to Mohammed, the accident occurred when a truck carrying fertilizer collided with a Toyota Hijet truck and a refuse collection truck.

He added that officers from the Federal Road Safety Corps promptly removed the damaged vehicles to prevent traffic congestion.

The D-G urged motorists to adhere to traffic regulations and drive cautiously to ensure their safety.

This incident comes just a day after a tragic crash at the same location, where a truck lost control and crashed into stationary vehicles, triggering a massive explosion. That accident claimed 10 lives and left over 30 people injured, many of whom are still receiving treatment in various hospitals.

Suspended Kogi Central senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has taken her allegations against Senate President Godswill Akpabio to British news network Sky News, claiming she endured over a year of unwanted advances from him.

During the interview on Wednesday, Akpoti-Uduaghan maintained that her suspension from the Senate was not due to misconduct, as officially stated, but a direct consequence of speaking out against Akpabio’s alleged sexual harassment.

She alleged that Akpabio repeatedly told her she must “please him” to fully enjoy her privileges as a senator.

“I made an allegation of sexual harassment against the President of the Nigerian Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio, on March 5, 2025, and the very next day, I was suspended for six months. I believe my suspension is illegal, unjust, and just a way of silencing me,” she said.

Detailing her experience, she added, “I experienced sexual harassment over the past year at the hands of the Senate President, and because I refused to yield to his demands, it turned into malice whereby my rights and privileges as a senator were deprived.

“I found the courage to speak up; yes, the breaking point was moving me from that seat. I have had to endure a whole lot in silence.”

When asked about the Senate’s claim that she was suspended for gross misconduct, Akpoti-Uduaghan dismissed it as an attempt to suppress her voice.

“Yes, they did mention that I was suspended on grounds of gross misconduct, but can they please provide what the gross misconduct is that amounts to a six-month suspension the day after I submitted a petition? I was suspended because of that petition, not because of any gross misconduct.

“Let’s talk about the gross misconduct that has happened in the Nigerian chambers. I was only told to move, and I refused to move my seat because I deserved to be notified; I deserved to be given a chance to explain why I should retain my seat,” she stated.

She further argued that her suspension highlights double standards in the Senate, as male colleagues involved in more disruptive conduct have not faced similar penalties.

“I have seen in that chamber where men fight, where Senators throw items at each other, curse each other, shout at each other, but they were not suspended. Why? Because they were men. Things got difficult for me; I was always complaining.

“My husband would actually walk up to him because they are friends, saying, ‘My wife has a very important bill, her constituency needs this, why don’t you give her a chance to speak? And he would tell me, ‘Next time.’ So he deliberately kept on denying me this.

“Each time I walked to him he’d tell me, ‘Right here I am the chief presiding officer of the National Assembly, so you have to please me, make me happy to get these privileges.’ And that happened several times. Because I refused, it developed into malice. Which other way was I supposed to make my voice heard?”

Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension was announced on March 6 following a heated exchange with the Senate leadership over her seating arrangement. The dispute escalated when she accused Akpabio on Arise TV of targeting her for rejecting his alleged advances.

Her interview with Sky News comes just days after she took her case to an international stage, speaking at the Women in Parliament session of the Inter-Parliamentary Union at the United Nations in New York. There, she called for international scrutiny of the Nigerian Senate’s actions.

She also revealed that, as part of her suspension, she has faced additional sanctions, including the withdrawal of her security detail, salary reductions, and a six-month ban from the National Assembly.

INTRODUCTION

In an era where democracy is supposed to reign supreme giving democracy dividends to beleaguered Nigerians, the nation has once again found itself at crossroads, a sober moment of reckoning where constitutional order is being tested in the most brazen of ways. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, sworn to uphold the Constitution, has taken a most unprecedented and unlawful step: the suspension of a democratically elected Governor, Deputy Governor and an entire State House of Assembly under the thin guise of emergency rule. What emergency? Nigerians and Rivers people did not see or feel any such emergency.

Let me be very firm most categorically and unequivocally that no constitutional provision,statute or any known convention grants the President the imperial and dictatorial authority to single-handedly dissolve the structures of an elected state government.That may probably have been in the locust days of military juntas; but Nigeria is today not under the firm grip of a military dictatorship.

The last time I checked, she is supposed to governed under a constitutional democracy that operates a presidential and republican form of government. The emergency provisions under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution exist to restore order only in times of grave national crisis; certainly not to topple duly elected state officials. Lois X1V of France as an absolute dictator could not have done better and would therefore green with envy from his cold grave,having on 13th April, 1655, stood in front of parliament and imperiously exuded,” L’Etat C’est Moi” (“I am the State” ).A state of emergency does not and cannot translate to a civilian coup d’état, executed by executive fiat through a national broadcast which torpedoed elected structures and whimsically imposed a sole Administrator who would now illegally receive Rivers State allocations from the Federation account under section 162 of the Constitution contrary to the very judgement of the Supreme Court which President Bola Ahmed Tinubu pretended to be executing.We have seen this script play out before during the infamous 2004 Plateau State emergency, where former President Obasanjo suspended Governor Dariye in what was widely condemned as a travesty of constitutional governance.

Then, as now, the excuse was “exceptional circumstances”; but the reality was nothing short of executive lawlessness and overreach masked as national interest.I had criticized it in the same way I also criticized those of former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Ebele Jonathan

And now, as Rivers State stands at the centre of this unfolding simulated constitutional debacle, one must ask: Is this the signal of a dangerous precedent for and kite-flying to Nigeria, of a looming maximum dictatorship in the offing in a one-party State? Will other “erring” Governors who refuse to align with the central government be next in line? Are we witnessing the return of a

dangerous era of impunity where emergency rule becomes the bludgeon of political control rather than a tool for stability?

Let me be very clear about this for historical purposes: President Tinubu clearly lacks the power,authority and vires to suspend democratic structures, especially the removal of Governor Sim Fubara and the Rivers State House of Assembly members. His act constitutes nothing but a gross constitutional aberration and a most illegal, unlawful, wrongful and unconscionable step that has the potential of imploding Nigeria at large and Rivers State in particular.The Constitution must stand hallowed, unassaulted,or democracy will fall and perish. Although time shall tell,but time is certainly not on our side.


THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR A STATE OF EMERGENCY

The Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, at page 379, defines “Declaration” as an official or formal statement, especially about the plans of a Government or an organization; the act of making such a statement.

Declaration or proclamation of a state of emergency therefore means proclaiming or making known a situation of emergency. What does “emergency” itself mean?

Emergency Doctrine is variously referred to as “emergency”, “imminent peril” or “sudden peril” Doctrine [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, Page 523)

A “state of emergency” is defined in Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (P.1620) as

“when a government gives itself special powers in order to try to control an unusually difficult or dangerous situation, especially when this involves limiting people’s freedom”

“Emergency powers” are such powers as are conferred on a Government during such an unusual situation to hold the state together.

The Constitution in Section 305, of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as altered (the organic law and grund norm of the land) embraces three adjuncts of a declaration of a state of emergency: (1) Reasons for proclaiming it; (2) How it is proclaimed; (3) How it can be halted both before and after its proclamation. It also envisages two types of State of Emergency: (i) By Mr. President under Section 305 (3) (a) and (b), when the Federation is at War; or the Federation is in imminent danger of invasion or involvement in a state of war. (ii) The scenario where it is the Governor of a State who personally calls for the state of emergency under situations envisaged in Section 305 (3) (c), (d) and (e). This occurs where the threat does not extend beyond the boundaries of the State.


Section 305 of the 199 Constitution, as altered, provides:

1) “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the President may by instrument published in the Official Gazette of the Government of the Federation issue a Proclamation of a state of emergency in the Federation or any part thereof.

2) The President shall immediately after the publication, transmit copies of the Official Gazette of the Government of the Federation containing the proclamation including the details of the emergency to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, each of whom shall forthwith convene or arrange for a meeting of the House of which he is President or Speaker, as the case may be, to consider the situation and decide whether or not to pass a resolution approving the Proclamation.”

None of the factors envisaged in Section 305 of the Constitution has occurred at all to warrant the steps taken by the president. In present scenario the bi-camera National Assembly had not even first met,discussed and approved the president’s emergency proposals before he acted. He did it in advance ( in futuro) in expectation of rubber-stamping by a pliable and malleable NASS.I hereby call on the NASS to show class for once by roundlly rejecting the President’s unconstitutional act of first declaring a state of emergency before its approval and also for acting altra vires by accompanying it with the suspension of elected democratic structures. This will place them on the right path of history.Otherwise,they should be prepared to be damnified by history.

I must emphasize that the declaration of a state of emergency does not translate into a dissolution of governance structures within the affected state. Under a state of emergency, the Governor, as the chief executive of the state, remains in office,whilst the institutions of government at the state level continue to function,unless expressly provided otherwise by law.There is no such law in Rivers State or at the national level.

The framers of the 1999 Constitution were deliberate in ensuring that the power to declare a state of emergency is not an avenue for executive overreach or imperious excursion into the realm of narcissm or ego trip. While the President may take extraordinary measures to maintain peace and order, those measures must align with the provisions of the Constitution. There is no provision howsoever, express or implied, that allowed President Tinubu to remove a sitting Governor and state House of Assembly legislators under the thin guise of emergency powers. There is no war in Nigeria. There is no threat of external aggression or invasion either across the country or in Rivers State. All that we have seen have been tussle for power between the Governor and the House of Assembly and the courts had already waded in with the Governor declaring he would comply with the Supreme Court’s judgement.A mere blow up of oil pipes in two communities by unidentified persons certainly does not constitute a war or external invasion situation.


THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION of POWERS AND FEDERALISM

Nigeria operates a federal system of government, which means that power is divided and shared between the federal, state and Local Government Areas.governments. This structure is designed to prevent excessive concentration of power in any one level of government,for as Lord Acton once explained, “power tends to corrups and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. The President’s authority over the states is limited, just as a Governor cannot interfere with presidential functions at the federal level.

Furthermore, the principle of separation of powers, a cornerstone of constitutional democracy as ablly propounded in 1748 by a great French philosopher, Baron de Montesquieu,ensures that no single branch of government has unchecked authority. The removal of a Governor is a matter strictly within the purview of the State House of Assembly, as stipulated under Section 188 of the Constitution. The process is quite detailed, lengthy and rigorous; and requires a legislative super majority to accomplish. It is not a power and prerogative the President can usurp and exercise as did President Tinubu, regardless of the circumstances.


CAN THE PRESIDENT SUSPEND OR REMOVE A SITTING GOVERNOR, DEPUTY GOVERNOR, OR HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY EVEN UNDER A STATE OF EMERGENCY?

Nigeria stands at a critical juncture in its democratic evolution. Recent developments in Rivers State, where President Bola Ahmed Tinubu purportedly suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his Deputy, and the entire House of Assembly, call for a meticulous constitutional examination and analysis. At the heart of this matter lies an age-old question: Can the President, under the guise of emergency rule, lawfully suspend or remove a democratically elected Governor, Deputy Governor, or Legislature?

The answer, based on constitutional provisions, legal precedents and the very principles of federalism which we operate, is an unequivocal NO. The 1999 Nigerian Constitution (as amended) does not, under any circumstance, empower the President to remove, suspend, or torpedo duly elected state officials even under Section 305, which governs the declaration of a state of emergency.


THE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS OF EMERGENCY POWERS

In no place does Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution grant the President the power to suspend a Governor, Deputy Governor, or the State House of Assembly. This reality is backed by constitutional jurisprudence and was reaffirmed in Attorney-General of Abia State v. Attorney-General of the Federation (2002) 6 NWLR (Pt. 763) 265, where the Supreme Court clarified that the Constitution is supreme and that no authority including the President can act outside its provisions.

Yet, this is not the first time that Nigeria has witnessed an outright abuse of emergency powers. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s 2004 suspension of Plateau State’s Governor Joshua Dariye and the House of Assembly remains a painful reminder of how emergency provisions have been misused to subvert democratic structures.

That unconstitutional precedent, which many Nigerians condemned then as executive overreach reminiscent of military juntas, appears to have resurfaced in Rivers State where President Tinubu’s action has eerily followed that same better-forgotten pattern, with the Judiciary left untouched as a token concession to constitutionalism. But can democracy survive when two out of the three arms of government are arbitrarily dissolved? I believe not.


FEDERALISM, SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND THE ROLE OF STATE GOVERNMENTS

Nigeria operates a federal system, meaning that power is distributed between the central and state governments, as explicitly outlined in Sections 4, 5, and 11 of the 1999 Constitution. Under this system, a Governor is not an apron string of or mere extension of the Presidency. He is an independently elected authority answerable to no one but only the people of his state who elected him.

The Constitution does not permit a President to unilaterally whimsically and arbitrarily remove a Governor—not by fiat; not by emergency decree; and certainly not by mere executive pronouncement. The doctrine of separation of powers, a fundamental pillar of democracy, dictates that such removals must be carried out strictly in accordance with constitutional provisions.

This principle was reinforced in Attorney-General of Ogun State & Ors v. Attorney-General of the Federation & Ors (1982) 3 NCLR 583, where the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Government cannot unilaterally impose duties or restrictions on state officials. This means that even if a state of emergency is lawfully declared, the Governor remains in office unless impeached through due process.

The Constitution provides only one legal pathway for the removal of a state Governor, and that is through impeachment, as stipulated in Section 188 of the Constitution. The process is legislative, not executive, requiring a State House of Assembly to initiate and conduct impeachment proceedings as dictated by the Constitution. In any event, the Rivers State House of Assembly ( whether rightly or wrongly) had already commenced one against the Governor. Why truncate the constitutional process through an unconstitutional executive fiat? Why? Why?? Why???


THE PUBLIC ORDER ACT AND THE LIMITS OF FEDERAL CONTROL

Some have sought,in most illogical and unscholarly manner, to justify the President’s emergency intervention in Rivers State under the masquerade and facade of maintaining public safety. They cite the Public Order Act, which grants state Governors powers over public assemblies, meetings, and processions. However, even this statute does not authorize the suspension of an entire government structure.

The irony, of course, is that while Governors are designated as the Chief Security Officers of their states, they lack actual control over security forces. Section 215 of the Constitution subordinates a State Commissioner of Police to the Inspector General of Police and the President, meaning that even if Rivers State were experiencing insecurity, it was ultimately to the same traducing Federal Governmen it would have turned to.

The absurdity of this power imbalance,even though Rivers State had not gotten there, was noted in Attorney-General of Abia State v. Attorney-General of the Federation (2002) 6 NWLR (Pt. 763) 264, where the Court observed that the Federal Government cannot pass the blame for state security failures to a Governor who lacks the constitutional means to deploy security personnel.


THE ROLE OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY: A CONSTITUTIONAL FIREWALL?

Even if the National Assembly, sought to legislate on emergency rule, section 11(4) of the 1999 Constitution explicitly prohibits it from removing a Governor or Deputy Governor. This means that not only does the President lack the power, but even the National Assembly itself is equally barred from such unconstitutional act.

Prof. Ben Nwabueze, one of Nigeria’s foremost constitutional scholars, had long warned that allowing a President to wield unchecked emergency powers would erode democracy and lead to an authoritarian system where Governors served as vassals at the pleasure of the President rather than the electorate.

In line with this reasoning, Chief F.R.A. Williams had condemned the Plateau State emergency declaration as “a contradiction of all known principles of true federation operating in a democratic society.” Are we not now witnessing history repeat itself in Rivers State?


THE PRINCIPLE OF EXPRESSIO UNIUS EST EXCLUSIO ALTERIUS

One of the most fundamental principles of statutory interpretation is expressio unius est exclusio alterius, meaning that the explicit mention of one thing implies the exclusion of all others. Sections 4 and 5 of the 1999 Constitution donate specific executive and legislative powers; but nowhere do they mention any inherent powers allowing the President to remove Governors undemocratically.

This principle was applied in Attorney-General of Bendel State v. Aideyan (1989) 4 NWLR (Pt. 118) 187, where the Supreme Court held that powers not expressly granted by the Constitution cannot be assumed. Thus, any claim that the President possesses inherent emergency powers to remove a supposedly erring Governor is legally baseless.The President can not dorn the garb of a Primary School headmaster who has absolute control over and supervises his pupils


HOW A GOVERNOR MAY BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE

If Not the President, then who can remove a Governor under emergency rule? The answer remains the State House of Assembly as the only body constitutionally empowered to initiate impeachment proceedings against an erring Governor.

Under Section 188, impeachment is a rigorous and multi-step process, requiring:

a.. A written notice signed by at least one-third of Assembly members;

b. A two-thirds majority vote to proceed further;

c. The formation of an investigative panel by the state Chief Judge;

d. A full blown hearing granting the Governor a right to defence either by himself or through a counsel of his choice;

e. A final two-thirds majority vote for removal after thorough hearing, recommendations, etc.

If a Governor remains in office, it is because the State House of Assembly has not found legal grounds for removal. The President’s personal opinions, political considerations, or security concerns do not change this constitutional scenario.


ANY HISTORICAL PRECEDENT FOR RIVERS STATE?

The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State and the subsequent suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his Deputy, and the State House of Assembly by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu brings Nigeria into another moment of constitutional crisis and democratic reckoning. While this may appear to be a novel occurrence, history reminds us that this is not the first time a Nigerian President had wielded emergency powers in a manner that undermined the very very essence of democracy.

Emergency rule in Nigeria has precedents, but each instance had always been marred by legal controversy, constitutional breaches and political opportunism. The most striking parallel to Tinubu’s action in Rivers State can be drawn from the 2004 Plateau State emergency declared by former President Olusegun Obasanjo. In that case, Obasanjo had suspended the Governor and the State House of Assembly, replacing them with a Sole Administrator, Major-General Chris Alli (Rtd.). That action was roundly criticized as an overreach of executive power, much like what is unfolding today in Rivers State. I was one of the critics.

However, even further back in Nigeria’s history, the Western Region crisis of 1962 under the First Republic presents another instructive example. Under the 1960 Independence Constitution, the then Governor-General, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, acting on the advice of Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa, had declared a state of emergency in the Western Region due to political turmoil. Balewa had removed the Premier, the Governor, all Ministers, and members of the Regional Assembly, installing Dr. Moses Majekodunmi as Sole Administrator.

The striking difference, however, is that this took place under a Westminster parliamentary system, where Parliament held sovereignty. In contrast, Nigeria’s current presidential system operates under constitutional supremacy, not parliamentary supremacy. The framers of the 1999 Constitution deliberately excluded any provision that would allow such sweeping executive powers, particularly those that could enable a President to remove a sitting Governor or dissolve a State House of Assembly under emergency rule.


WHY TINUBU ’S EMERGENCY RULE IN RIVERS STATE IS UNPRECEDENTED

Even within the history of emergency rule declarations, Tinubu’s action in Rivers State is particularly alarming. While previous Presidents who declared emergency rule (Balewa in 1962 and Obasanjo in 2004) did so under questionable legal interpretations, they at least had some statutory backing, however flimsy.

Tinubu, on the other hand, has no legal foundation whatsoever to suspend an elected Governor, Deputy Governor, or the State House of Assembly. There is no enabling law, no precedent under the 1999 Constitution, and no Supreme Court ruling that grants the President such sweeping powers.

The 1999 Constitution, as amended, is as clear as a whistle that section 305 which grants the President powers to declare a state of emergency does not provide for the removal or suspension of an elected Governor.

Section 11(4) explicitly denies even the National Assembly the power to remove a Governor under emergency rule; meaning it certainly cannot authorize the President to do so.

The principle of federalism, which underpins Nigeria’s governance structure, dictates that Governors derive their mandate directly from the people and not from the President.


WHAT COULD HAPPEN IF THIS PRECEDENT IS ALLOWED TO STAND?

One of the most dangerous aspects of President Tinubu’s action is the precedent it sets for the future of democracy in Nigeria. If a President can wake up one morning and, under the guise of an emergency, remove a Governor and dissolve the State Legislature, what prevents the same President or future Presidents from doing the same in other states?

In fact, if the logic of this unconstitutional action is stretched further, it raises an even more disturbing possibility:

What if a President wakes up tomorrow and declares an emergency in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT)? The Constitution recognizes the FCT as a state.

Could the President then suspend the Senate and the House of Representatives that supervise the FCT and appoint himself as Sole Administrator of the FCT and Federal Republic of Nigeria?

These hypothetical scenarios, once dismissed as absurd,l in my earlier research have now become real threats when constitutional violations are left unchallenged and unchecked.


PRESIDENT TINUBU ’S ATTEMPT TO RELY ON NONEXISTENT EMERGENCY LAWS

To compound the legal crisis, Tinubu’s government seeks to justify its actions by invoking emergency regulations that do not exist in Nigeria’s current legal framework. The 1961 Emergency Powers Act, which was made pursuant to Section 65(1) of the 1960 Constitution, is no longer in force. That law had allowed the Governor-General to make sweeping regulations, including appointing an Administrator, restricting fundamental rights, and even suspending state governments.

However, this law ceased to have effect long ago. When Nigeria transitioned from the Westminster system to the presidential system in 1979, the framers of the Constitution deliberately omitted any provision that could allow such broad emergency powers.

The Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 1990,provide a clear confirmation: the 1961 Emergency Powers Act is described as “omitted; spent”. This means that it has since been consigned to the vehicle of historical oblivion and cannot be resurrected to justify Tinubu’s current unconstitutional acts.


A CLOSING CAVEAT: THE PERILOUS PRECEDENT OF TINUBU’S EMERGENCY RULE IN RIVERS STATE

Not a few Nigerians have argued quite plausibly, too, that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s recent declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State and the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his Deputy, and the State House of Assembly was not purely a matter of law and order, but an act driven by political expediency and personal indignation.

The President finds himself presiding over a nation teetering on the brink economic hardship, rising insecurity, public angst,and deep-seated political fractures. Yet, rather than confront these crises headlong with statesmanship, his administration appears to be flexing emergency powers in a manner that raises more questions than it answers. If Rivers State warranted emergency rule, why then have states like Zamfara and Niger where armed bandits and insurgents have reduced governance to an afterthought not received the same treatment?

Even the most ardent defenders of Tinubu’s emergency Decree ( for a Decree it is in reality) must pause and ask: Is Rivers State the greatest threat to national stability, or is it merely the most convenient political battleground? If emergency rule in Rivers was truly about law and order, why was a hand-picked Administrator imposed while duly elected officials were unceremoniously suspended from office? Is this about democratic governance, or is it about power and control?

If Nigeria remains a constitutional democracy, then the same Constitution must apply to all, irrespective of political affiliation or convenience. If Tinubu’s draconian action in Rivers State is allowed to stand, it sets a dangerous precedent where emergency powers become a tool for political suppression and repression rather than a last resort for genuine intractable crises.

So, the question remains: Is this the Nigeria we want or deserve? Or shall we, in our studied silence, watch democracy dismantled piecemeal with one emergency declaration at a time? History will surely judge us all.

President Bola Tinubu on Thursday hailed the National Assembly for its decisive and patriotic ratification of the State of Emergency proclamation in Rivers State.

The President described the move as a a critical step to restoring stability after a protracted political crisis that paralysed governance in the state and endangered national economic security for over 15 months.

A statement signed by Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, on Thursday, said Tinubu specifically commended the National Assembly’s leadership—Senate President Godswill Akpabio, House of Representatives Speaker Tajudeen Abbas, other principal officers and members—for prioritising the security and welfare of Rivers State people above partisan interests and other considerations.

He further acknowledged the lawmakers’ diligent review of classified security briefings, underscoring the urgent need for intervention to prevent further escalation.

“The crisis in Rivers State was at a perilous tipping point, threatening the security of vital oil and gas installations and undermining the national economy and the significant progress we have made in the reforms initiated since our administration commenced in May 2023.

“As I detailed in my address to the nation on 18 March, the near-total collapse of governance, threats to federal economic assets, and the risk of widespread violence left no room for hesitation. This emergency measure is a lifeline to safeguard livelihoods, secure critical infrastructure, and restore democratic accountability,” the statement quoted the President to have said.

The President affirmed that the six-month emergency will empower the newly-appointed Sole Administrator to stabilise Rivers State, address systemic breakdowns, and facilitate dialogue among conflicting parties.

Tinubu also reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to deepening collaboration with the National Assembly to advance peace, economic resilience, and equitable development across Nigeria.

“Today’s decision exemplifies what our nation can achieve when unity of purpose and patriotism guide the action of leaders. We remain steadfast in pursuing a safer, more prosperous Nigeria—one where every citizen’s potential is safeguarded and nurtured,” he said.

The President thanked all Nigerians for their understanding and urged all stakeholders to support the restoration of peace in Rivers State.

The National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) has announced that Corps Members will begin receiving an increased monthly allowance of ₦77,000 starting in March 2025.

NYSC Director General, Brigadier General Olakunle Oluseye Nafiu, made this confirmation during an interactive session with Corps Members at the Wuse and Garki NYSC Zonal Offices in Abuja on Thursday.

Addressing concerns about the delay in implementing the new allowance, Brigadier General Nafiu reassured Corps Members of the Federal Government’s commitment to their welfare.

“With effect from March, you will receive Seventy-Seven Thousand Naira as your monthly allowance. NYSC is efficient in record-keeping, and I assure you that your payments will be made. The nation and the Scheme appreciate you,” he stated.

He urged Corps Members to remain patient and dedicated to their service, highlighting the NYSC’s role in fostering national unity and instilling values such as patriotism and teamwork.

On behalf of her colleagues in the Garki Zone, Corps Member Zaka Deborah Alheri (Call Number: FC/24A/5831) expressed gratitude to the Director General for his efforts in ensuring the allowance increase becomes a reality.

Brigadier General Nafiu also acknowledged the dedication of Corps Members across the country, emphasizing that their contributions are valued by both the NYSC and the nation.


A transparency campaign group, Leadership & Accountability Initiative has condemned the umbrella body of students in the country, the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) for allowing itself to be hijacked and captured as a political tool by those in government. 

The group particularly accused the son of the President, Seyi Tinubu of planting moles in the association to advance political gains, warning that the disappearing influence of NANS is inimical to citizens' right to hold divergent opinions. 

In a statement on Wednesday, the lead Convener of the group, Hon. Ibrahim Bako expressed disappointment with the response of NANS to a "constructive" criticism by Shamsudeen Bala Mohammed, the son of the Governor of Bauchi State, saying NANS' position reflects a disturbing trend that has unfortunately overtaken the association. 

"It is deeply troubling to see an association, which is supposed to champion the rights and welfare of Nigerian youths, reduce itself to a mouthpiece for the interests of those in power. Your statement in defense of the president’s son, rather than focusing on the core concerns and needs of Nigerian students, exposes how far NANS has strayed from its mission. You have allowed yourself to become a mere political instrument, lending your voice to those in power, while abandoning your responsibility to question, challenge, and advocate for the issues that truly matter to Nigerian students and youths", Hon. Bako stated. 

According to him, NANS' mandate has always been to fight for the improvement of education, the betterment of the living standards of students, and defend their rights but expressed dissatisfaction that the association'recent actions indicate that it has abandoned these core functions, instead focusing on political partisanship. 

"Your position, defending a hollow gesture of distributing sachet foods while ignoring the larger systemic issues of youth unemployment, engagement and empowerment is not only a disservice to the students you are meant to represent but, also an insult to their intelligence. The youths of Nigeria deserve better than political gifts and short-term reliefs. We deserve the dignity of real support: quality education, sustainable business opportunities, meaningful scholarships, and an environment where we can thrive without relying on charity or crumbs thrown from political tables", he noted. 

He therefore called on NANS to return to its roots, reevaluate its role in the Nigerian political and social landscape, and refocus on its core mission of representing the interests of Nigerian students and youths and not political figures or their families. 

He said time has come for NANS to recognize that the Nigerian youths do not need political favours or empty gestures, rather a lasting changes in the education system, an economy that allows youths to thrive, and leaders who are genuinely committed to the welfare of every Nigerian.


The Abia State Police Command has dismissed a Mobile Police officer for unethical conduct, emphasizing its commitment to maintaining discipline within the force.

In a statement on Wednesday, the command confirmed that the officer had been de-kitted and officially dismissed after facing disciplinary proceedings.

The police authorities reiterated their stance on zero tolerance for misconduct, assuring the public that erring officers would be held accountable.

A press statement the command issued on Wednesday and signed by the Police Public Relations Officer, PPRO DSP Maureen Chinaka on behalf of the Commissioner of Police, Danladi Isa, read, “The public is hereby notified that Inspector Kufere Moses, formerly serving at Mopol 55 PMF Aba and attached to UBA Bank Guard in Aba, Abia State has been dismissed from the Nigeria Police Force, effective 21st February 2025. He has also been de-kitted, and all police accoutrements have been retrieved from him.


“This action follows administrative disciplinary measures taken against him by the command for ‘discreditable conduct and offences against discipline’.

Isa reaffirmed the command’s zero tolerance for unprofessional conduct and assured the public that the command will not condone the activities of bad elements within the force.

“Under my leadership, the command remains committed to the Inspector General of Police’s vision of ensuring a professionally competent, service-driven, rule-of-law-compliant and people-friendly police force”, the CP said.

All efforts to get relevant police authorities for further details on the offence proved abortive as none could be reached.


Operatives of the Nigeria Police Force have arrested Adura Aloba, the younger brother of the late singer Ilerioluwa Aloba, aka Mohbad, at the Magistrates’ Court in Ogba, Lagos State.

Adura was reportedly taken into custody on Wednesday, along with his friend Ibrahim Koleosho, aka King White, shortly after attending a legal proceeding related to a phone sale dispute involving Damola Ayinde.

This development comes months after Mohbad’s mother, Abosede, clashed with actor Yomi Fabiyi during a January press briefing, where allegations were made against Adura.

This followed a petition filed by Fabiyi on Friday, December 13, 2024, alleging that the deceased’s brother initiated an Instagram chat wherein he claimed to have video evidence of how Mohbad died.

Fabiyi in the petition he posted on his social media handles alleged that the chat went on with Adura demanding the sum of N3m to be paid in Bitcoin in exchange for the video evidence.

However, Adura denied the allegation stating that the chat was from Ayinde whom he had sold his phone.

A forensic investigation has since been conducted while the court is still probing the case.

Reacting to the arrest, Abosede broke down in tears in a viral video monitored by our correspondent on Wednesday, pleading for help to locate her son.

In the viral video, she could be heard wailing inside a vehicle, claiming that actor Yomi Fabiyi and one Sam Jojo orchestrated the abduction.

Speaking in Yoruba, she said, “Please help me, Nigerians. Yomi Fabiyi and Sam Jojo have taken my son. I don’t know where they are taking him to. He asked them to take my son away. My son did nothing to them. They must not lay a hand on him, he is sick. Demola, you’ve put me in trouble. Mohbad’s spirit will fight you.”

Adura had earlier in December demanded a public apology from Fabiyi, Ayinde, and others, alleging that they hacked his TikTok account to damage his reputation.

He had also filed an N1bn lawsuit against them for defamation, tampering with evidence, and fraudulent claims implicating him.

A member of the family who spoke to our correspondent on the condition of anonymity on Wednesday said the arrest was not unconnected to a heated exchange of words between Koleoso and Fabiyi.

“We don’t know the whereabouts of Adura but I can confirm that his friend, Koleosho, was arrested after the court proceedings today. Everything just happened suddenly. We learnt there has been some exchange of words between Koleosho and Fabiyi over the issue relating to the phone and this may have led to the arrest. We don’t know where the security men came from but we have been trying to locate their whereabouts.” the family source disclosed.

Fabiyi did not respond to calls made to his phone, while a text message sent to him had yet to be replied to as of the time this report was filed.

A police source who knew about the arrest confided in PUNCH Metro that they were arrested by operatives of the Zone 2 Police Command.

“Yes, they were arrested by the police operatives from Zone 2, Onikan, not men of the Lagos State Command,” he said.

When asked why they were arrested, the source directed our correspondent to contact the zonal police spokesperson, Ayuba Umma. As of the time of filing this report, all efforts to reach the spokesperson proved abortive as she did not pick up our calls nor responded to our enquiries.

 
In response to the recent pipeline explosions in Rivers State, the Federal Government has deployed 10,000 Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) personnel to curb further attacks on oil installations.

Confirming the development on Wednesday, NSCDC spokesperson Afolabi Babawale stated that anti-vandal operatives have been sent to the affected areas, particularly in the Niger Delta, to protect critical infrastructure and prevent future pipeline vandalism.

“The NSCDC hereby warns against destruction and vandalism of critical national assets and infrastructure across the Niger Delta as over 10,000 operatives have been deployed to collaborate with other security agencies to provide adequate peace and security of lives and property,” Babawale said.

This came as the opposition lawmakers and Organised Labour protested the imposition of emergency rule in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu.

Tinubu in a national broadcast on Tuesday announced the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, Prof Ngozi Odu and the state assembly members.

He also nominated Vice Admiral Ibok-Ette Ibas (retd.) as the state’s sole administrator.

Ibas, who was sworn in at the Aso Villa on Wednesday, will administer the state for an initial period of six months.

Before the declaration of the emergency rule, the political atmosphere in the state was charged, leading to three explosions within two days.

The explosions followed threats by Ijaw groups against the push to impeach Fubara, as they vowed to disrupt oil production and cripple the economy if lawmakers removed the governor.

On Monday, the Martin Amaewhule-led Assembly, loyal to former governor Nyesom Wike, listed 19 infractions committed by Fubara in a misconduct notice, setting the stage for his impeachment.

Before the notice was served on both the governor and his deputy, there was an explosion on Sunday at the Trans Niger Pipeline in Aluu, in the Ikwerre Local Government Area of the state.

Security agents on Wednesday recovered a corpse at the scene of the explosion, while a suspect was arrested in connection with the blast.

An official said the suspect was arrested following credible intelligence from Pipeline Infrastructure Nigeria Limited’s covert team operating in Aluu.

The PINL staff member, who gave his name simply as Ebikeme, said, “On Sunday the 16th day of March 2025, there was a blast on the TNP Pipeline Right of Way in Aluu – Zone 5 and a suspected vandal was found dead at the site of the incident from the effects of the blast.

“Upon further investigation, a suspected vandal was apprehended in connection with the incident. The suspect is currently in the custody of the Nigeria Police while further investigation is being carried out to nab all the perpetrators.”

Speaking on the deployment of 10,000 armed personnel of the NSCDC to curb pipeline vandalism, Babawale said the commands nationwide are on high alert to protect the nation’s vital assets, particularly in the Niger Delta.

Babawale stated, “The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps has a statutory mandate as the lead agency in the protection of critical national assets and infrastructure.

“In this regard, the corps across the federation have placed the commands and formations on red alert to forestall all acts of economic sabotage, pipeline vandalism and destruction of government utilities.

“However, it is a notable fact that no security agency has the monopoly of strategies in tackling crime and criminalities, hence the NSCDC is working in collaboration with other sister security agencies in the protection of lives and property.”

More soldiers deployed

On Wednesday,Governor Fubara moved out of the Government House in Port Harcourt.

The governor’s destination could not be confirmed. It was unclear if he retired to his private residence in Port Harcourt or his hometown in Opobo.

However, more soldiers were seen in patrol vans trooping into the Government House.

One of our correspondents observed three Armoured Personnel Carriers at the entrance of the building.

Also, the movement of persons and vehicles into the Government House was being subjected to heavy security scrutiny.

An aide to Fubara who pleaded anonymity told our correspondent that the soldiers were occupying the Government House.

He stated, “As I speak with you, more soldiers are entering the Government House. This afternoon, over 15 came in. They are believed to be an advanced team of the Sole Administrator who is still expected to resume duties. This evening, some more soldiers came in.”

The aide could not account for his principal’s whereabouts as of the time of filing this report.

N’Assembly debates today

The National Assembly has slated today to debate the legality of the emergency rule declared in Rivers State by the President.

The Senate and House of Representatives shifted the debate to today amidst a groundswell of opposition to the decision.

On Wednesday, House spokesman, Akin Rotimi, announced that the President had transmitted a letter to the National Assembly on the Rivers State crisis, saying that it would be read on the floor.

That was, however, not to be.

There was an earlier indication that the plenary could be rowdy when two female lawmakers, Blessing Amadi (PDP, Rivers) and Marie Ebikake (PDP, Bayelsa) traded uncomplimentary words over the constitutionality or otherwise of the President’s decision to suspend democratic structures in the state.

It took the intervention of some members to restore order in the hallowed chamber, even as Ebonyi lawmaker, Kama Nkemkanma, was seen banging a table, claiming that, “Nothing will happen here today.”

Some legislators were seen conversing in low tones over the development in the South-South state as they awaited the commencement of plenary.

Following the approval of the votes and proceedings of the previous legislative day, the Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu, who presided over plenary in the absence of the Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, called for the submission of petitions, an indication that the letter from the President would not be read.

However, after taking petitions and motions of urgent public importance, the charged atmosphere became calm as it was evident that the issue of emergency rule in Rivers State would not come up for mention.

The deputy spokesman of the House, Phillip Agbese (APC, Benue), said the House would only make its decision known after Mr President’s letter has been read and debated by members on the floor of the Green Chamber.

He noted, “The letter from the President has not been debated and the parliament has not taken any decision. There is nothing we can do about it for now until it is debated.

“For us as a parliament, it is still the same way that Nigerians have seen it on the pages of newspapers even though the leadership of the parliament was invited. But officially, Mr Speaker has not communicated that to the floor.”

At least 73 senators and 240 members of the House must vote in support of the emergency rule at the sittings of the lawmakers today.

Ibas sworn in

Tinubu, on Wednesday, swore in the sole administrator for Rivers State.

The AGF, Fagbemi; Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila; Principal Private Secretary to the President, Hakeem Muri-Okunola and the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Mr Bayo Onanuga and others witnessed the short ceremony at the State House, Abuja.

Born on September 27, 1960, Ibas was commissioned as a sub-lieutenant in the Nigerian Navy in 1983 and held various command positions until President Muhammadu Buhari appointed him the Chief of Naval Staff in August 2015.

He was retired when Buhari replaced his service chiefs in 2021.

After retirement from service, Buhari appointed him the Nigerian High Commissioner to Ghana, where he served between 2021 and 2023.

Speaking with State House correspondents, Ibas pledged to prioritise peace, security, and stability in the state.

He stressed the need to restore law and order as the foundation for any meaningful governance and development in the state.

“First of all, I think we know the circumstances that led to where we are here,” he said, denoting the events that led to his appointment.

Ibas said the primary mandate of his administration was to work with all stakeholders to ensure stability.

“Mr President made it very clear in his broadcast. If the main issue is that of maintaining law and order in the state, I think for any meaningful activities to take place in Rivers State, that is the utmost task,” he stated.

The retired naval chief affirmed that his administration would collaborate with relevant authorities and the people of Rivers State to restore peace and ensure effective governance.

‘Presidential declaration unconstitutional’.

The anger over the suspension of democratic structures in Rivers State continued to grow on Wednesday, with the opposition and Labour kicking against the decision.

The Peoples Democratic Party has berated President Tinubu and insisted that Fubara remained the Governor of Rivers State despite the declaration of a state of emergency and his suspension by the President.

The PDP National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, speaking at a press conference in Abuja on Wednesday, stated that the Nigerian Constitution does not grant President Tinubu the authority to declare a state of emergency or suspend a governor.

Ologunagba stated, “What President Tinubu is attempting to do is to suspend the 1999 Constitution, overturn a democratic government and foist an undemocratic regime in Nigeria in gross violation of Sections 1 (2), 14(2)(a), 180, 217(2)(b) (c) and 305 (2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

“Section 180 of the 1999 Constitution is clear on the tenure of a state governor, which is prescribed as four years commencing from the date of the swearing-in. The only means provided for in the Constitution for the abridgment of the tenure of a governor is death, resignation, incapacitation or impeachment and not by suspension by the President.”

The PDP urged the National Assembly to exercise its legislative authority to address this constitutional violation.

Ologunagba emphasised the importance of maintaining calm and reiterated its unwavering support for Governor Fubara and the people of Rivers State.

On his part, PDP South-South Caretaker Committee Chairman, Emma Ogidi, accused President Tinubu of focusing solely on Fubara while overlooking the involvement of Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Wike, in escalating the Rivers crisis.

He stated, “Mr President, all through his speech, he blamed the governor for everything, but what happens to the chief investigator? No mention was made of the FCT Minister, his own minister, who we all know is the chief investigator.

“He has had several press briefings, has assaulted elders, has assaulted the Ijaw nation. Only last Saturday, he went to Abulama. He went with a contingent of soldiers, saying he was being honoured. A minister, going about with a contingent of soldiers.

“So when the thing was announced on Tuesday, we were not surprised because he has found a loose cannon.A man who has no respect for authorities, who believes in his own self. That’s why he’s doing what he’s doing. It’s unfortunate for us that our President has not brought him to book.”

He accused the President and the ruling party of working to capture River State.

Also, a former Bayelsa State Governor, Seriake Dickson, faulted Tinubu’s action, describing it as a ‘power grab.’

The senator representing Bayelsa West also vowed to mobilise his colleagues to ensure that the President doesn’t get the needed support to validate his action in Rivers.

Dickson disclosed this in an interview with selected journalists in Abuja.

He said, “It is unconstitutional. Most people see this as a power grab. Is there a constitutional provision mandating the president to declare a state of emergency? Yes, but you’ve got to scrutinise it and see whether it comes under that general provision. Even when you come to that conclusion, does that justify the removal of elected officials? No!

“You can’t talk about anything emergency unless you have a minimum of 73 senators sitting and 240 members of the House of Representatives present. And you must do that in two days. Otherwise, everything goes back to square one. So you see, I don’t know the kind of advice the President has.

“I’m not in a position to speculate about the numbers. The leadership knows best, but mine is to be available and network with my colleagues. Those of us who don’t believe in it are quite large in number. I am talking about senior ranking members who, in the protection of democratic rights created by the constitution, will say no to it.”

Also, the lawmaker representing Ideato North/Ideato South Federal Constituency of Imo State, Ikenga Ugochinyere at the National Assembly, likened Tinubu’s emergency declaration in Rivers as akin to asking the military to take over an elected government.

He said, “The governor should head to the courts. I am not going to speak for him, but some of us believe this should also be tested in court; it should also be resisted. Even with a gun to my head, I will not vote in support of that. Where does this leave us as lawmakers?”

NLC, TUC tackle FG

Weighing in, the Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria strongly condemned the emergency rule, describing it as “an assault on democracy.”

In a joint statement on Wednesday, the NLC President, Joe Ajaero, and his TUC counterpart, Festus Osifo, denounced the President’s action as “hasty and unconstitutional,” violating Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution.

“This reckless move should deeply concern every reasonable governor and citizen who believes in the rule of law,” the statement read.

“No democratic society can thrive where elected leaders are arbitrarily removed at the whims of the President,” it added.

The labour unions argued that the suspension or removal of the governor, deputy governor, and the state House of Assembly members was unlawful and set a dangerous precedent, eroding constitutional governance and threatening the autonomy of subnational governments.

“We demand the immediate reversal of this unconstitutional state of emergency in the interest of democracy, economic stability, and the welfare of Nigerian workers.

“Nigeria’s democracy must not be sacrificed on the altar of political expediency,” the unions warned.

CSOs fault Tinubu

The Country Director of Amnesty International Nigeria, Isa Sanusi, described the development as “a setback for the rule of law,” noting that the authorities must ensure that the situation did not become a reason to deprive the people of their rights.

“The Nigerian authorities must uphold human rights in Rivers State and ensure that the emergency does not become a cause or reason to deprive people of their rights.

“The suspension of democratic institutions is a setback for the rule of law. There must be safeguards for people’s rights,” he said.

Similarly, the National Coordinator of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria, Emmanuel Onwubiko, rejected Fubara’s suspension, likening the development to the military coups that occurred in Niger, Burkina Faso, and Mali.

“This unconstitutional takeover of another branch of government in Rivers State under Governor Siminalayi Fubara by an elected civilian President and his grotesque, nebulous and sham decision to bring back a retired Naval Chief to exercise the same powers of an elected governor is a calculated attempt to establish a dictatorship,” Onwubiko said in a statement.

The Coalition of Northern Groups, in a statement signed by its National Coordinator, Jamilu Charanchi, cautioned the President to tread carefully.

“Instead of allowing Wike’s rhetoric to dictate policy, Tinubu should focus on fostering unity and addressing the underlying grievances that fuel discontent.

“By doing so, he can reinforce his leadership while mitigating the risk of exacerbating tensions,” the group noted.

AGF defends President

Addressing the concerns over the emergency rule, the Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), described it as a “clear signal” to other crisis-ridden states that the Federal Government will not tolerate breaches of the Constitution.

Fagbemi said the President took a “bold decision” to stop the state from “complete collapse,” stressing that Fubara would have been impeached if not for the presidential intervention.

“Let the signal be sent for those who want to foment trouble,” the AGF said when he briefed State House correspondents at an emergency edition of ‘Meet the Press’, organised by the Presidential Communications Team at the State House, Abuja, on Wednesday.

The minister further explained that the President’s intervention was unavoidable, given the constitutional breaches in Rivers, including the demolition of the state House of Assembly and Fubara’s failure to deter militants from vandalising oil pipelines.

“The action of the President is the effect of a fundamental cause, and you cannot be treating the effect in order to cure the cause. What was the cause? The governor and members of the House of Assembly. So, you have to behave responsibly, and you must have the gut,” he stated.

Fagbemi recalled that the Supreme Court had made “very profound findings of breaches of the Constitution,” noting especially that the court described the Rivers State governor as having acted “like a despot,” effectively leaving the state with “no government.”

He explained that Tinubu had explored multiple avenues with other well-meaning Nigerians and thought leaders to resolve the crisis in Rivers before resorting to a state of emergency.

Fagbemi argued that with the nation almost reliant on crude oil, anyone ‘touching’ the pipeline is not only an enemy of Rivers but Nigeria.

“Don’t forget that before now, Nigeria was producing about 900,000 barrels of crude oil per day. With the efforts of the President, he ensured that the production rose to about 1.15 million litres of barrels per day.

“That’s about a 45 per cent increase. Governors were smiling home at the end of the month with about a 60 per cent increase in their take home to various states.

“Then somebody rose or encouraged or became inactive when he was supposed to act. There was not a word dissuading the militants who issued this threat.

“In today’s Nigeria, we still rely largely on oil. Anyone who touches these pipelines is not only an enemy of Rivers; he is the enemy of Nigeria.

“All Nigerians in all 36 states share what comes in from the production of this oil. And I believe that the decision of Mr President is anchored on the decision of the Supreme Court alert,” he added.

The AGF also dismissed suggestions that Wike had a hand in the crisis.

“Where do you put the Minister of FCT in this case? Was he the one who asked for the demolition of the House of Assembly?

“Was he the one who said the governor should not present his budget to the House of Assembly?

“Was he the one who advised the governor not to go through the House of Assembly for purposes of ratifying the commissioner nominees? I don’t know,” Fagbemi said.

 

(Punch)